The Triumph of the Moon, or How a Modern Religion Was Born
2026-11-06
Ornate title page of Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches by Charles G. Leland, framed by a carved stone archway with columns and foliage, published by David Nutt, London, 1899
Title page of Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches by Charles Godfrey Leland, London, David Nutt, 1899. Via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).
How a retired colonial civil servant, a disproven theory and a poet’s pen produced the first religion born in modern England. A historian’s account of Gerald Gardner, Doreen Valiente, Alex Sanders and Raymond Buckland, of the sources Wicca borrowed from, and of why its invented history makes it no less a religion.
And thou shalt be the first of witches known;
And thou shalt be the first of all in the world.
— Charles Godfrey Leland, Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches (1899), chapter I
The popular picture of Wicca comes in two versions, and both are wrong. In the first, Wicca is the Old Religion itself, the faith of the burned witches, handed down in secret from the Stone Age to a coven in the New Forest. In the second, it is a hoax: a retired eccentric’s game of dressing up, unworthy of serious attention.
The historian has to disappoint both camps. Wicca is not ancient. And it is not a joke.
The thesis: Wicca is a modern religion, assembled in twentieth-century England from Victorian folklore, ceremonial magic, Romantic paganism and one discredited theory, and it is precisely as a modern creation that it deserves to be taken seriously.
In the previous essay we watched historians dismantle Margaret Murray’s witch-cult. This is the story of the people who believed in it anyway, and built something real.
[](#a-thesis-takes-on-a-life "Jump to this heading")A Thesis Takes on a Life
When Murray published The Witch-Cult in Western Europe in 1921, she meant to explain the past. She could not have known she was writing a charter for the future.
Her claim, that the accused witches were members of a surviving pagan fertility religion with a horned god and a goddess, gave modern seekers exactly what they longed for: an old, suppressed, nature-loving faith of the people, older than the Church and persecuted by it. Historians would reject the claim. But a religion does not need a historian’s approval to be lived.
[](#i-leland-and-the-gospel-of-the-witches "Jump to this heading")I. Leland and the Gospel of the Witches
Photographic portrait of Charles Godfrey Leland as a younger man, with a dark beard and a high-collared coat
Charles Godfrey Leland, photograph by an unidentified photographer, mid-nineteenth century. Library of Congress, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).
Before Murray there was Charles Godfrey Leland, a Philadelphian humorist, folklorist and collector of Gypsy and Italian lore. In 1899 the London publisher David Nutt brought out his Aradia, or the Gospel of the Witches.
Leland claimed that the text had been given to him by an Italian informant he called Maddalena, a fortune-teller from whom he gathered folk tradition. It tells how Diana sent her daughter Aradia to earth to teach witchcraft to the oppressed peasants, and to set them against their lords and the Church. The epigraph above is the goddess’s charge to her daughter.
Whether Aradia records a real Tuscan tradition, Maddalena’s own inventions or Leland’s improvements is still disputed. No independent trace of the gospel has been found. But its influence on later witchcraft is not in doubt. Phrases and ideas from Aradia would pass, half a century later, into the liturgy of Wicca.
[](#ii-the-magicians "Jump to this heading")II. The Magicians
Diagram of an inverted-point pentagram drawn as a five-pointed star inside concentric circles, inscribed with letters and symbols, from Eliphas Lévi
The pentagram, from Eliphas Lévi, Dogme et rituel de la haute magie, 1855. Via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).
The second current flowed from ceremonial magic. The French occultist Éliphas Lévi made the pentagram the emblem of the magician in the 1850s. The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, founded in London in 1888 and already the subject of an essay on this blog, built an elaborate system of ritual magic out of Kabbalah, Hermeticism and Masonic forms. Aleister Crowley, its most notorious alumnus, recast that system in his own religion of Thelema.
From these sources Wicca would inherit its ritual grammar: the circle, the elements and their quarters, the working tools, the pentagram as emblem. A historian can trace the lineage line by line. That is not a scandal. Every religion borrows its vocabulary from the culture around it.
[](#iii-a-customs-officer-from-malaya "Jump to this heading")III. A Customs Officer from Malaya
Gerald Brosseau Gardner was born in 1884 near Liverpool and spent most of his working life in the East, as a planter and then as a customs officer in British Malaya. An amateur ethnographer and antiquarian, he wrote on the Malay kris and dug for ancient sites. In 1936 he retired to England and settled near the New Forest, in Hampshire.
There he joined an esoteric group, the Rosicrucian Order Crotona Fellowship, which ran a small theatre near Christchurch. Inside that circle, by his own account, he found a smaller group of people who confided to him that they were witches.
[](#iv-the-new-forest-story "Jump to this heading")IV. The New Forest Story
Gardner said that in September 1939, at a house near Highcliffe, he was initiated into a coven of the old religion, a coven that had survived, as Murray had suggested, from pagan times. He named as its leading figure a local woman, Dorothy Clutterbuck, who died in 1951.
How should the historian read this?
Not as a lie, necessarily, and not as proof. Ronald Hutton, who examined the evidence closely in The Triumph of the Moon (1999), found that Dorothy Clutterbuck was a real, well-off local woman, and that there is nothing in her known life or papers to make her the high priestess of a secret pagan cult. He concluded that the New Forest group, if it existed in the form Gardner described, was itself a modern creation, built by people who had read Murray, Leland and the magicians. Other researchers, notably Philip Heselton, have argued for a more substantial group behind Gardner’s account and proposed other members. The debate continues.
What nobody has found is evidence of a coven reaching back beyond the twentieth century. On that point the historians agree.
[](#v-from-fiction-to-testimony "Jump to this heading")V. From Fiction to Testimony
Gardner had a problem: in England, publicly claiming to be a witch was legally risky.
The Witchcraft Act of 1735, as the previous essay recalled, had abolished the crime of witchcraft and replaced it with the offence of pretending to exercise magical powers. It was still used in the twentieth century, most famously against the medium Helen Duncan in 1944.
So Gardner first published in disguise. In 1949, under the pen name Scire, he issued a novel, High Magic’s Aid, through Michael Houghton of the Atlantis Bookshop in London. It presented, in medieval costume, a witchcraft recognisable as an early version of Wicca, with a goddess and a god.
In 1951 Parliament repealed the Witchcraft Act and replaced it with the Fraudulent Mediums Act. The same year, Cecil Williamson opened a museum of witchcraft and folklore at Castletown on the Isle of Man, and Gardner became its resident witch.
Three years later he spoke openly. Witchcraft Today (1954), with an introduction by Margaret Murray herself, presented him as an anthropologist who had found a living survival of the witch-cult. The book, and the newspaper interest that followed, made Gardner a public figure, and drew in seekers who wished to join.
[](#vi-crowleys-shadow "Jump to this heading")VI. Crowley’s Shadow
Gardner had met Aleister Crowley in 1947, the last year of Crowley’s life; Crowley’s diary records his visits that May. Gardner received from Crowley a charter for the Ordo Templi Orientis.
The meeting left marks on the text. Gardner’s early ritual book, known as Ye Bok of ye Art Magical, drew openly on Crowley’s writings and on Golden Dawn material, alongside Leland’s Aradia and the Key of Solomon. This is the documented record, not a hostile rumour: later Wiccan writers themselves have traced the borrowings line by line.
The point is not that Wicca was “really” Crowley. It is that Gardner wrote from the shelf of a twentieth-century English occultist, which is exactly what he was.
[](#vii-doreen-valiente-poet-of-the-craft "Jump to this heading")VII. Doreen Valiente, Poet of the Craft
The figure who did most to give Wicca a voice of its own was a woman.
Doreen Valiente contacted Gardner after reading about him in the press and was initiated by him in 1953. In The Rebirth of Witchcraft (1989) she recalled that she immediately recognised, in the text read at her initiation, passages from Crowley’s Book of the Law and from Leland’s Aradia, and told Gardner so. He was, she wrote, none too pleased.
Valiente argued that the cult would never win acceptance while Crowley’s influence was so obvious. Gardner told her, in effect, to do better. She did. Through the mid-1950s she rewrote much of the liturgy, keeping Leland’s words where she thought them right and replacing much of the Crowley with her own poetry. Her version of the Charge of the Goddess, in verse and then in prose, became perhaps the best-loved text in Wicca.
In 1957 Valiente and others left Gardner’s coven, in part over his appetite for publicity. She went on to become one of the craft’s most respected writers and, in old age, something like its conscience: honest about its modern origins, and unashamed of them.
[](#viii-the-king-of-the-witches "Jump to this heading")VIII. The King of the Witches
If Valiente was the poet, Alex Sanders was the showman.
A Mancunian who claimed to have been initiated as a boy by his grandmother, Sanders built in the 1960s a tradition that came to be called Alexandrian Wicca. It drew principally on Gardnerian material, with more ceremonial magic added. Sanders courted the press, styled himself “King of the Witches”, and was the subject of the 1970 film Legend of the Witches.
Historians treat his account of his own origins with the same caution as Gardner’s. But his publicity brought Wicca to a younger generation in the years of the counterculture, and Alexandrian covens took root alongside Gardnerian ones.
[](#ix-across-the-atlantic "Jump to this heading")IX. Across the Atlantic
Raymond Buckland, an Englishman living in the United States, corresponded with Gardner and was initiated in 1963. Returning to America, he founded a Gardnerian coven at Brentwood, on Long Island, in 1964, generally considered the first in the United States.
America did to Wicca what it does to every import: it multiplied it. Within two decades there were Gardnerian and Alexandrian lines, eclectic covens and solitary practitioners, feminist and Goddess-centred currents, and new traditions, including Buckland’s own Seax-Wica, founded in the 1970s on Anglo-Saxon themes. Wicca stopped being a single initiatory line and became a family of religions.
[](#x-the-wheel-of-the-year "Jump to this heading")X. The Wheel of the Year
Illuminated manuscript page for February: peasants warm themselves by a fire inside a small house while outside a snowy farmyard shows sheep, beehives, a woodcutter and a traveller with a donkey, under an arc of zodiac signs
February, from the Très Riches Heures du duc de Berry, by the Limbourg brothers, c. 1412–1416. Musée Condé, Chantilly, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).
Among Wicca’s most visible creations is the Wheel of the Year: eight seasonal festivals, the solstices and equinoxes together with four festivals drawn from the Celtic calendar as nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholarship imagined it.
It looks ancient. It is not, in this form. Gardner’s early coven observed four great festivals; the solar festivals were added in the late 1950s, and the eightfold scheme took shape in conversation between Gardnerian witches and the Druid revivalist Ross Nichols. The Wheel’s names and dates combine genuine medieval and folk elements, Victorian theories of fertility religion and modern design.
The Halloween essay on this blog followed one of those festivals, Samhain, and showed how much of its “ancient” reputation is recent. The Wheel as a whole is the same: an old seasonal instinct given a new and beautiful shape.
The calendar pages of the Très Riches Heures above are not a Wiccan document. They show something deeper that the Wheel draws on: the medieval sense of the year as a circle of labour and weather, turning under the stars.
[](#xi-hutton-and-the-triumph-of-the-moon "Jump to this heading")XI. Hutton and the Triumph of the Moon
The decisive book in this field is Ronald Hutton’s The Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft, published by Oxford University Press in 1999.
Hutton did two things at once. He showed, with an archive historian’s patience, that Wicca could not be what its founders had claimed: there is no evidence of an unbroken pagan witch religion. And he showed what it actually was: the meeting point of many genuine nineteenth- and twentieth-century currents, from Romantic poetry’s goddess of nature and the rural nostalgia of Victorian England to Masonic and magical ritual, folklore studies and the “cunning folk” of the countryside.
Hutton presented the result not as a fraud but as a remarkable cultural creation, and went so far as to call Wicca the only fully formed religion that England has given the world.
Many Wiccans received the book with gratitude rather than anger. It took from them a false history and gave them a true one.
[](#xii-the-last-voyage-of-gerald-gardner "Jump to this heading")XII. The Last Voyage of Gerald Gardner
Gardner’s last decade was spent as a public witch. In 1954 he acquired the Castletown museum from Cecil Williamson and turned it into a museum of magic and witchcraft, filled with his own collections of weapons, amulets and curiosities. He gave interviews, appeared on television, initiated new priestesses who founded covens of their own, and published a second book, The Meaning of Witchcraft, in 1959.
He also quarrelled. Some of his oldest companions, Valiente among them, found his love of publicity reckless at a time when the newspapers liked nothing better than a witch scandal. Rival leaders emerged, each with claims to an older or purer lineage, and the Craft entered the long, argumentative adolescence that every young religion seems to need.
On 12 February 1964, returning by sea from a winter in Lebanon, Gardner died of a heart attack aboard the ship Scottish Prince. He was buried in Tunis. The old customs officer from Malaya had ended his life, fittingly, between continents.
It is tempting to make him either a prophet or a charlatan. He was neither. He was a romantic, an enthusiast, a collector and a showman, and also a man who genuinely believed that he had found something that should not die. The religion he launched has long since outgrown him. In 2014 a blue plaque was placed in Highcliffe in his memory, the kind of civic honour that would have been unthinkable in the year of the Witchcraft Act’s repeal.
[](#xiii-a-modern-religion "Jump to this heading")XIII. A Modern Religion
What is Wicca, then, for the historian?
It is a religion, in every sense that matters to the sociologist: it has beliefs about the divine, usually a Goddess and a God; a calendar; rites of passage; ethics; communities; clergy, in the form of priestesses and priests; and a growing body of sacred literature. It has been recognised in various forms by courts and armed forces in several countries. People marry, mourn and pray within it.
Its youth is not an argument against it. Every religion was once new, and most began with founding stories that historians later complicated. Wicca’s distinction is that its founding generation lived in the age of the archive, so its human origins are unusually visible.
And here a respectful historian should stop. The rites of a living religion are its own affair. This essay has traced where Wicca came from; it has not described what Wiccans do in their circles, and it will not.
Wicca is not the Old Religion survived. It is a modern religion, assembled in twentieth-century England from folklore, magic, poetry and a discredited theory, and it is precisely as a modern creation that it deserves to be taken seriously.
The burned witches of the last essay never belonged to it. But their memory, reimagined, became one of its foundations, and under both stories runs an older dream of hidden, saving knowledge, which the essay on Gnosis takes up.
--
Chamber of Reflections
Home