Baphomet, or the Goat That Never Entered the Lodge
2026-11-01
Engraving of Éliphas Lévi’s Baphomet: a seated winged figure with a goat’s head, a flaming torch between its horns and a pentagram on its forehead. It has a human torso with breasts, one arm raised and one lowered, with the words SOLVE and COAGULA on its forearms, a caduceus rising from its lap, and crescent moons, one light and one dark, to either side.
Éliphas Lévi, Baphomet, engraving from Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, vol. II (_Rituel_), 1856. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
The goat-headed Baphomet is often presented as the secret god of Freemasonry. It is not. The figure we know was drawn by a French occultist in 1856, its name comes from a fourteenth-century trial, and its “Masonic” career was invented by a hoaxer who confessed to it in 1897.
“…a circular dated July 14, 1889, written by myself in Paris…”
— Léo Taxil, confession at the Société de Géographie, Paris, 19 April 1897
In “Jahbulon” I wrote about a word that really does belong to a corner of the Masonic world, and about how it escaped into anti-Masonic literature and was bent out of shape on the way. This post is about the opposite case.
Baphomet is not a word that escaped from Freemasonry. It is a word that was pushed into it from outside.
Search the internet for “Freemasonry” and “Baphomet” and you will find thousands of pages, videos and diagrams claiming that the goat is the hidden idol of the lodge, the god of the high degrees, the secret behind the square and compasses. Some quote a terrifying “instruction” by Albert Pike. Some show Lévi’s engraving with a caption saying “the god of the Masons”.
I have been a Freemason for some years, and I will say this as plainly as I can: there is no Baphomet in Freemasonry. There never was. What there is, instead, is three separate stories, from three different centuries, which were glued together by people who either did not know better or did not want to.
So I will do what I always try to do on this blog: separate the traditions. Three layers. The Templars. Lévi. Taxil. Each in its own room, with the door closed.
And as always, Masonic discretion is not negotiable. Nothing in this post reveals any ritual, word, sign or content of any degree. None of that is needed to tell this story, because the story never happened inside a lodge.
[](#layer-one-friday-13-october-1307 "Jump to this heading")Layer one: Friday, 13 October 1307
Medieval miniature of two Templars, naked and bound to a stake, burning on a small green island surrounded by a river, while a man in a red cap stokes the fire with a long pole and townspeople in red, blue and yellow look on.
The burning of the Grand Master of the Templars and another Templar, miniature from the Chroniques de France ou de St Denis, workshop of the Virgil Master, after 1380. British Library, Royal MS 20 C VII, f. 48r. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
The first layer has nothing to do with goats, and nothing to do with Freemasonry. It begins in France, at dawn, in October 1307, when the agents of King Philip IV arrested the Knights Templar across the kingdom.
The charges were monstrous and, by then, familiar: denial of Christ, spitting on the cross, obscene kisses, sodomy, and the worship of an idol. Many of the same accusations had been thrown at heretics before, and Philip’s government had used very similar ones against his enemy Pope Boniface VIII.
The confessions were obtained under arrest, threat and, in many cases, torture. Over the following years the case moved between royal and papal hands. In 1312, at the Council of Vienne, Pope Clement V suppressed the order without formally condemning it. In March 1314, the last Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, and Geoffroi de Charney, who had retracted their confessions, were burned in Paris. The miniature above, painted a lifetime later, shows that scene.
That is the frame. Inside it, almost as a footnote, appears a strange word.
[](#a-word-in-the-trial-records "Jump to this heading")A word in the trial records
Among the many contradictory descriptions of the idol that the Templars were accused of venerating, a few depositions give it a name.
One knight from the south of France, Gaucerand de Montpezat, was recorded as saying that he had been shown an idol made in the shape of “Baffomet”. Another, Raymond Rubei, described a wooden head on which the figure of “Baphomet” was painted.
That is essentially all. The name appears in a handful of confessions, in Latin records, with spellings that wander. It does not appear as the name of a goat. The idol, when it is described at all, is most often a head: sometimes bearded, sometimes with several faces, sometimes a painted panel, sometimes a reliquary. The descriptions do not agree, which is exactly what one would expect from frightened men saying what their interrogators wanted to hear.
Historians have long noted how dubious these confessions are. Malcolm Barber, whose The Trial of the Templars remains the standard account in English, treats the idol accusations within that context of pressure and fear.
[](#bafomet-means-mahomet "Jump to this heading")Bafomet means Mahomet
Where does the word come from? The simplest answer is also the one most historians accept.
In medieval Occitan and Old French, Bafomet and similar forms were used for Muhammad. A Provençal poem of around 1250 by the troubadour Austorc d’Aorlhac, lamenting the defeat of the Seventh Crusade, uses Bafomet in exactly this sense. Medieval Christians widely, and wrongly, imagined that Muslims worshipped Muhammad as a god in the form of an idol.
Malcolm Barber reads “Baphomet” in the trial records as a corruption of “Mahomet”, and Peter Partner, in The Knights Templar and Their Myth, says the same. For men who had spent two centuries in the East, the accusation of worshipping “Mahomet” was the most obvious slander available: they had gone native, they had become secret Saracens.
In 1307, Baphomet was not a god. It was an insult with a misspelt name.
There were later, more exotic etymologies. In 1818 the Viennese orientalist Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall argued that the Templars had been Gnostics and read “Baphomet” as a Greek term connected with baptism and wisdom. Other theories followed. They make better stories. They are not better history.
[](#how-the-templars-entered-the-lodge-as-a-legend "Jump to this heading")How the Templars entered the lodge, as a legend
How, then, did the Templars come anywhere near Freemasonry?
Through legend. In the eighteenth century, as Masonic degrees multiplied on the Continent, some writers and some systems began to claim a romantic descent from the medieval Templars: knights who had supposedly survived the suppression and passed their secrets down in hiding. Historians find no evidence for any such continuity between the order dissolved in 1312 and the lodges of the 1700s.
Some Masonic bodies today use “Templar” names and imagery. That is a matter of symbolism and chivalric tradition. It does not make them heirs of Jacques de Molay, and it does not bring the idol of the 1307 confessions into the lodge.
But the legend created a bridge. Once Templars and Masons were imagined as one family, anything said about the Templars could be said about the Masons. Hammer-Purgstall’s Gnostic Templars were, in his eyes, a warning against the secret societies of his own day.
The bridge was built. Now someone had to give the idol a face.
[](#layer-two-alphonse-louis-constant-becomes-eliphas-levi "Jump to this heading")Layer two: Alphonse-Louis Constant becomes Éliphas Lévi
The face came from Paris, from a former seminarian named Alphonse-Louis Constant, who wrote under the Hebraized name Éliphas Lévi.
Lévi, born in 1810, had passed through the Catholic seminary, socialist and romantic politics, and the circles of magnetism and spiritualism, before turning to what he called “high magic”. Between 1854 and 1856 he published the two volumes of Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie, the Dogme in 1854 and the Rituel in 1856. Together they are one of the founding books of modern Western occultism; readers of “The Golden Dawn” will remember how much that order owed him.
In the second volume he included a full-page image he had drawn himself. He called it Baphomet, and also “the Sabbatic Goat”, and connected it with the “Goat of Mendes” of Egyptian lore as reported by Herodotus.
That engraving, the one at the top of this post, is the Baphomet. Every goat-headed Baphomet you have ever seen, on a T-shirt, an album cover or a conspiracy video, descends from it.
Before 1856, nobody had drawn Baphomet as a goat.
[](#reading-the-engraving "Jump to this heading")Reading the engraving
Look at it again. It is a deliberately composite figure.
A goat’s head, with a torch burning between the horns and a pentagram on the forehead. A human torso with female breasts. Wings. One arm raised, one arm lowered, pointing to a light crescent moon above and a dark one below. On the forearms, two Latin words: SOLVE and COAGULA, “dissolve” and “coagulate”, a pair borrowed from the language of alchemy. In the lap, where one would expect the genitals, a caduceus.
Every element pairs an opposite with its opposite: male and female, human and animal, above and below, light and dark, dissolving and binding. Lévi intended the figure as a symbol of balance, of the forces of nature held in equilibrium, and of what he called the Astral Light.
You may find this beautiful or grotesque. Either way, notice what it is: an occultist’s symbol, built from alchemy, Kabbalah, magnetism and romantic politics. It is not a Masonic symbol, and nothing in its sources is Masonic.
There is a small, revealing detail of dates. Lévi was initiated as a Freemason in Paris on 14 March 1861, five years after the Rituel was published, and he drifted away from the lodge within months. The Baphomet was drawn by a man who was not yet a Mason, for a book that was not about Masonry.
[](#the-goat-that-went-to-the-cards-and-the-cinema "Jump to this heading")The goat that went to the cards and the cinema
Lévi’s figure had a long and very visible afterlife, almost all of it outside Freemasonry.
It reshaped the Devil card of the tarot: the Rider–Waite design of 1909 borrows its goat-headed, torch-crowned devil from Lévi. It became an important figure in Thelema, the system founded by Aleister Crowley, who called Baphomet a divine androgyne. In the twentieth century it passed into modern Satanism, horror films, heavy metal and every kind of popular demonology.
That is a rich history, and one day it deserves its own post. But notice where it runs: through occult orders, through artists, through counter-culture. Not through the lodge.
So how did the goat end up with an apron on?
That is the third layer, and it is the shortest, the funniest and the most damaging.
[](#layer-three-leo-taxil-anticlerical "Jump to this heading")Layer three: Léo Taxil, anticlerical
Engraved portrait of Léo Taxil: a man with wavy dark hair, pince-nez spectacles and a thick curled moustache, wearing a jacket and cravat, signed by the artist in the lower right.
Henri Demare, portrait of Léo Taxil, engraving, as reproduced in the Portuguese translation Os mistérios da egreja, 1889. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (from HathiTrust).
Gabriel Jogand-Pagès was born in Marseille in 1854 and became famous under the pen name Léo Taxil. In the 1870s and early 1880s he made a living from ferocious anticlerical journalism and books: satires on the Bible, on the clergy, on the popes. He faced libel accusations, including over a book about the supposed secret loves of Pius IX.
He was also, briefly, a Freemason. He was initiated in a Paris lodge in 1881 and was expelled before he progressed beyond the first degree. Remember that: the man who would “reveal” the secrets of the high degrees never got past the first.
Then, in the mid-1880s, Taxil announced that he had converted. He repudiated his anticlerical works, made his peace with the Church, and in 1887 was received in audience by Pope Leo XIII.
The timing was perfect. In 1884 Leo XIII had issued the encyclical Humanum Genus, a sweeping condemnation of Freemasonry. A market for anti-Masonic revelation was ready. And Taxil, the repentant sinner, set out to supply it.
[](#palladism-and-the-devil-in-the-nineteenth-century "Jump to this heading")Palladism and the Devil in the nineteenth century
Book illustration in a dense engraved style: two men in robes, one old and bearded, recoil in front of a temple altar as winged, horned demons and a pale veiled spectre swirl above it, beside a statue of a woman on a pedestal.
Illustration from “Dr. Bataille” (Léo Taxil and Charles Hacks), Le Diable au XIXe siècle, vol. II, p. 161, Paris, 1894. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (scan from the Internet Archive).
Over the following decade, Taxil produced a flood of “exposures”. The most extravagant was Le Diable au XIXe siècle, “The Devil in the Nineteenth Century”, published in instalments from November 1892 to March 1895 under the name of a certain “Dr. Bataille”. Behind the name were Taxil and a ship’s doctor called Charles Hacks.
“Dr. Bataille” claimed to have travelled the world infiltrating secret rites. He revealed an inner order hidden inside Freemasonry, the Palladium, whose members, the Palladists, were said to worship Lucifer and take orders directly from demons. Its supreme head, according to the story, was the American Albert Pike, in Charleston, South Carolina.
The illustrations, like the one above, are pure Gothic melodrama: demons, apparitions, altars, terrified initiates. And Lévi’s goat appears in Taxil’s world too. His engraving was used on the cover of Les Mystères de la franc-maçonnerie dévoilés, one of Taxil’s lurid paperback exposés. Critics at the time, including A. E. Waite, pointed out that Taxil’s books plagiarized Lévi wholesale and attributed to him ideas he never wrote.
This is the moment the goat enters the lodge: not through a Masonic door, but through the window of a hoaxer’s book.
[](#diana-vaughan "Jump to this heading")Diana Vaughan
Every good hoax needs a heroine. Taxil’s was Miss Diana Vaughan.
She was presented as an American, a descendant of the seventeenth-century alchemist Thomas Vaughan, and a former high priestess of Palladism who had seen the light, turned to the Church and was now in danger of assassination by vengeful Masons. Her conversion was said to have begun with her admiration for Joan of Arc, at whose name the demons fled.
Under her name, Taxil published Mémoires d’une ex-palladiste and even a book of Eucharistic prayers that received warm praise in Catholic circles. Bishops and journalists wrote to her. Some Catholic writers began to doubt her existence, and the debate grew louder. Waite, who had read the material closely, listed its impossibilities: claims contrary to known facts about Pike and Thomas Vaughan, lodges said to be active where none existed, people in Calcutta who had left no trace at all.
Pressure mounted for Miss Vaughan to appear in public. Taxil promised that she would.
[](#19-april-1897-societe-de-geographie "Jump to this heading")19 April 1897, Société de Géographie
On 19 April 1897, Taxil called a press conference in the great hall of the Société de Géographie in Paris, where he had promised to present Diana Vaughan.
She did not appear. Instead, Taxil stood up and told the audience that there was no Diana Vaughan, no Palladium and no Dr. Bataille. The whole thing, twelve years of revelations, had been a hoax. His confession was printed in full in the Paris paper Le Frondeur on 25 April 1897, under the title “Twelve Years Under the Banner of the Church: The Prank of Palladism”.
In it, Taxil mentioned one document specifically: “a dogmatic circular about luciferian occultism, a circular dated July 14, 1889, written by myself in Paris, and which I disclosed as having been brought from Charleston to Europe by Miss Diana Vaughan on behalf of Albert Pike, its author.” He added, with something like pride, that even some Masonic journals had swallowed it.
The hall, by most accounts, ended in uproar. Taxil left, and lived quietly until his death in 1907.
One would think that was the end. It was not.
[](#the-forged-instruction-of-albert-pike "Jump to this heading")The forged “instruction” of Albert Pike
Photographic portrait of Albert Pike in later life: a heavy-set man with long, swept-back grey hair and a long full beard, wearing a dark coat, seated and looking slightly to the side.
Brady-Handy studio, Albert Pike, photograph, between 1865 and 1880. Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division (Brady-Handy collection, cwpbh.05100). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
Albert Pike was real, which is precisely what made him useful. Lawyer, poet, Confederate general, he led the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction in the United States from 1859 until his death in 1891, and wrote Morals and Dogma. He never led any “universal” Freemasonry, because no such office exists; Masonic authority rests with independent grand lodges.
The forged text is usually presented as an “instruction” or encyclical by Albert Pike to the supreme Masonic councils of the world, dated 14 July 1889. It declares that the “Masonic religion” of the higher degrees should be maintained “in the Purity of the Luciferian doctrine”, and goes on to praise Lucifer.
Here is its chain of custody, which is the whole refutation.
It appears in Abel Clarin de la Rive‘s La Femme et l’enfant dans la franc-maçonnerie universelle, published in 1894. De la Rive was a Catholic anti-Masonic writer. He did not have it from Pike, or from any Masonic archive. In a footnote, he says that it was Diana Vaughan whom Pike charged with carrying his “luciferian encyclical” to Paris during the Universal Exposition.
Diana Vaughan did not exist. Taxil invented her. And in 1897 Taxil said, in public, that he had written that circular himself, in Paris, and dated it 14 July 1889.
To his credit, de la Rive repudiated the Diana Vaughan material after the confession. The “instruction” has no source except a fictional woman, and its author confessed.
[](#how-the-forgery-still-circulates "Jump to this heading")How the forgery still circulates
And yet, if you search for “Albert Pike Lucifer”, you will find the quotation everywhere.
The route is well documented. In 1933, Edith Starr Miller, styled Lady Queenborough, reproduced it in her conspiracy book Occult Theocrasy, taking it from de la Rive. From there it passed into twentieth-century anti-Masonic and fundamentalist literature, often with a footnote that cites Miller citing de la Rive citing “Pike”: a quote of a quote of a quote. The internet did the rest. Today it travels as a screenshot, without even the footnote.
Each step removes a little more of the context, until all that is left is a famous name, a terrifying sentence and Lévi’s goat placed beside it for decoration. Three different centuries, one composite image, and no source at the bottom.
In 2000, a Catholic diocesan newspaper in Vancouver even published a retraction and apology after reprinting the Taxil material as genuine. I mention it not to mock anyone, but because it shows how sincere people can be caught by a hoax that its own author publicly withdrew more than a century ago.
[](#three-rooms-one-goat "Jump to this heading")Three rooms, one goat
Let us close the doors again, one by one.
In the first room, 1307 to 1314, frightened knights confess under pressure to venerating a head called “Baffomet”, a garbled “Mahomet”. No goat. No lodge.
In the second room, 1854 to 1856, an occultist draws a goat-headed figure of balance, writes SOLVE and COAGULA on its arms, and calls it Baphomet. An occult symbol. Not Masonic, drawn by a man who was not yet a Mason.
In the third room, 1885 to 1897, a former anticlerical journalist builds a Satanic Freemasonry out of nothing, borrows Lévi’s goat and Pike’s name, and then tells the world it was a joke. The forged “instruction” of 14 July 1889 is his.
In “Jahbulon” I asked readers to look carefully at what a word really is before deciding what it means. Baphomet deserves the same courtesy. It is a fascinating figure, with a real history in trial records, in occultism, in tarot and in art.
But that history happened elsewhere.
There is no Baphomet in Freemasonry. The goat never entered the lodge. It was carried to the door by a liar, who then confessed, and it has been standing outside ever since.
--
Chamber of Reflections
Home